Tag Archives: General Relativity

How Does LIGO Point Back to a Source?

LIGO published the position of their gravitational wave on the sky when they announced that they had found something, so I was wondering how this could be done. While LIGO has more information that just timing, I decided to consider the case of reconstructing a position based just on the relative timing from two detectors.

I started with a coordinate system with the origin at the center of Earth (assumed to be a perfect sphere here). The z-axis points toward the north pole, the x-axis toward the equator at the Greenwich meridian and the y-axis 90 degrees east of the x-axis. I can then place the two detectors in this coordinate system (easiest using spherical coordinates). The time separation for a gravitational wave along some axis given by a unit vector u(θ,φ) is just

\Delta t(\theta,\phi) = \frac{R_\oplus}{c}({\bf v_1}-{\bf v_2})\cdot {\bf u(\theta,\phi)}

where v1 and v2 are the unit vectors pointing toward the two detectors, R is the radius of Earth, and c is the speed of light (the speed of the waves). If each detector can measure the time of the wave to some uncertainty σ and the relative timing uncertainty (typically from GPS) is negligible, I can define some likelihood that u is the correct vector as

L(\theta,\phi) = e^{-\frac{1}{2}\chi^2(\theta,\phi)}

where

\chi^2(\theta,\phi) = \frac{(\Delta t_{\rm meas} - \Delta t(\theta,\phi))^2}{2\sigma^2}

Using this function for some test values, we can try to understand how pointing works. If the time separation is 0, then we expect to see most likely values along the great circle between the two detectors.

Map_0msSep1msUnc
Skymap in standard spherical coordinates of a gravitational wave measured with 1 ms precision with 0 time separation. Red indicates a good fit, blue is poor.

I will also note that this is plotting position on the sky in Earth coordinates. Earth is not in an inertial reference frame: it rotates and moves in space, so actually mapping this against the stars in the sky gets very complicated and I’ll ignore that since it doesn’t affect what I want to show. The coordinates are also spherical coordinates, which are non-Euclidean, so shapes look strange if you’re not used to them. The curve above is actually the spherical version of a “straight” line. For a time separation of 8 ms, we see a thin ring that widens out as the resolution is degraded.

Map_8msSep100usUnc
Skymap of a gravitational wave with a time separation of 8 ms and a precision of 100 microseconds.
Map_8msSep1msUnc
Skymap of a gravitational wave with a time separation of 8 ms and a precision of 1 ms. The thin ring is getting wider, with even the center not having a terrible likelihood.
Map_8msSep2msUnc
Skymap of a gravitational wave with a time separation of 8 ms and a precision of 2 ms. The ring is starting to turn into just a blob. The strange vertical band at low theta is just an effect of the coordinates. That corresponds to basically just a single point in the sky.

At 10 ms, we’re getting a large separation, and the ring has shrunk almost to just a blob.

Map_10msSep1msUnc
At a time separation of 10 ms and a precision of 1 ms, we no longer see the ring and just see a roughly elliptical blob.

Basically, what seems to be going on is:

  1. The general shape of the likelihood distribution is a ring of positions corresponding to the measured time separation
  2. As the time separation increases, the size of the ring on the sky decreases
  3. When the separation is too large (requires a speed less than c), no position works well, so there is a sharp peak at the best (but still non-optimal) position.
  4. The ring is characteristic of having two detectors. The center of the ring never changes (there are actually two centers depending on the sign of the separation) and its position is determined by the positions of the detectors
  5. A third detector should break the degeneracy and allow for reconstruction of the position as a single point on the sky
  6. Since the measured position looks like a blob, it looks like the time separation is large enough for the timing uncertainty to prevent us from seeing a ring-like shape.
Advertisements

Colbert & Brian Greene Discuss Gravitational Waves

Yesterday, Columbia professor Brian Greene was on Colbert’s show to talk about gravitational waves. Greene gives some nice explanations for laymen (with graphics!) about gravitational waves in general and about LIGO. He even brings out a Michelson interferometer to demonstrate how the LIGO setup works (though not with gravitational waves). Since Greene is a theorist, I would assume that someone else had to set up the interferometer for it to actually show some sensible results. You can find the video on Youtube here.

Are There Neutrinos Associated With Gravitational Waves?

IceCube and Antares have looked for evidence of neutrino emission coincident with the gravitational wave signal seen by LIGO. They see no evidence of neutrinos being emitted by the gravitational wave source. That doesn’t mean there are no neutrinos, just that even if there are, not enough reached us to be able to see them. But, as the article points out, this means that gravitational wave and neutrino observatories can now work together to try to study rare astrophysical events.

LIGO Announces Discovery of Gravitational Waves

LIGO has confirmed the rumors about what they had seen and announced that they have found the signature of a merger of two black holes over a billion light years away. This event was actually very fortunate, as it happened before the main science run started but while the detectors were operating as if a regular science run was going on. The signal is good enough to tell how long ago the event happened and even how much mass the system has and how much energy was lost due to radiation.

Both LIGO sites – Louisiana and Washington – saw the signal but unfortunately, there were no other interferometry experiments operating at the time to get a third signal. Hopefully some new sites will come online in the near future so that a worldwide gravitational wave measurement network can be set up. Large neutrino detectors do something similar for supernovas so that if several detectors see a bunch of events at once, we know that a supernova will be seen in a particular part of the sky. With three sites, there would be some ability to point back at the direction of the source of the gravitational wave using timing information.

Regardless, this is a very strong signal that was seen at two sites that are several thousand miles apart. It looks quite convincing, and hopefully if we’ve already seen one event in a short run time, we’ll see a lot more as LIGO continues to run and as other experiments are built.

Gravitational Wave Rumor Back in the News

The rumor from earlier this year that LIGO has found gravitational waves has returned. This time, there’s a theorist who claims that a paper will be released by Nature in less than a week, so we won’t have to wait long to see if this particular rumor is true. The claim is that LIGO has found definitive evidence of a black hole merger, which would be very exciting. Measurable gravitational waves are expected to be generated when two very large objects orbit one another at a close distance, with the waves bleeding off energy and causing the orbital radius to decrease until the objects merge. An interferometry experiment like LIGO would then see a clear oscillating signal from the orbits of these two objects. Gravitational waves are one of the most important predictions of general relativity that we could measure.